JPEG or PNG for photo prints and posters? 2 pages: [1] 2
Rooshoo
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 10:44:34 AM

Groups: Member

Joined: 6/11/2012
Posts: 76
Hi all, I'm in the process of uploading some of my photography to a new Zazzle store and was wondering if veteran photographers have any specific tips on format--I have already read the official Zazzle guide. While Zazzle supports both PNG and JPEG, is there a better format for high quality prints and posters? Any help would be awesome!
Steve Crompton
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 11:09:10 AM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 12/3/2010
Posts: 1,448
I always use JPEG at the highest quality possible unless the image has transparent areas, in which case I use PNG.
It's simply a matter of file size; a full quality JPEG will be noticeably smaller than a full quality PNG when made from the same original image.

Steve.
Peter Wuebker
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 12:10:02 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 4/7/2008
Posts: 605
JPEGS would probably be the worst choice in my opinion because they are compacted and so some image information is necessarily lost.

Most of our work is done with png which is not compacted.

For my photography prints and canvasses, I use TIFF which provides for the most image data and resizes well. The files are usually quite large but that is because they have more image data.

Tips News & Ideas
FB/How To Make Money Online With Zazzle

Use the WWW link below
byrdgirl13
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 12:21:08 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 272
Location: Denver
I avoid jpg like the plague for photos. I know some photographers use them successfully at the very highest quality, but I can't get past the fact that jpg compression is lossy and png compression is not. That is, you actually lose a bit of the information in the photo when you save it as a jpg, even at the highest quality settings. When you lose enough, you start getting visible artifacts that look like weird distorted noise.
Steve Crompton
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 12:26:11 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 12/3/2010
Posts: 1,448
As part of my job in the past I did extensive testing of various formats in regard to quality, and my assertions are based on that testing - not to mention the fact that I would never have made the post above if it were not based on sound fact. If it were practical I would use 48 bit TIFF myself (as I do for much of my archive work).
JPEG is a perfectly good format when higher quality settings are used and simply setting the quality to the maximum will give very good results, but if your software has advanced settings then use them.

Steve.
dreamNwish_Photo_Art
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 12:36:57 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 9/24/2009
Posts: 3,940
I was told by pro photographers that JPEG is the way to go.

I was also told that it really does depend on the settings of your camera, the actual camera and what you do to the photo when editing when comparing JPEG to any other format.

I use JPEG for the images I sell from another online store and many of the photographers there have told me that it's what they use, unless they're putting in some sort of special effects, and then it may save better as PNG.

Steve Crompton
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 1:14:25 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 12/3/2010
Posts: 1,448
Hi DNW,

Just out of interest, do you know where the 'JPEG' comes from?
try Joint Photographic Experts Group
a bunch of rather serious people dedicated to creating a compression format specifically suited to photographic images - look 'em up on Wikipedia or just google it.

Steve.
LivingNature
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 1:59:58 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 11/30/2007
Posts: 46
I only use PNG when an image has transparency. PNGs are just too big for me to want to stop using JPEGs.
Steve Crompton
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 2:03:02 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 12/3/2010
Posts: 1,448
LivingNature wrote:
I only use PNG when an image has transparency. PNGs are just too big for me to want to stop using JPEGs.

Same here - used properly there's absolutely nothing wrong with JPEG.

Steve.
dreamNwish_Photo_Art
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 2:38:58 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 9/24/2009
Posts: 3,940
Steve Crompton wrote:
Hi DNW,

Just out of interest, do you know where the 'JPEG' comes from?
try Joint Photographic Experts Group
a bunch of rather serious people dedicated to creating a compression format specifically suited to photographic images - look 'em up on Wikipedia or just google it.

Steve.


Thanks, Steve. Smile

I found it and saved it to my favorites. I'll back to check it out even more when I can.
Steve Crompton
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 2:47:11 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 12/3/2010
Posts: 1,448
dreamNwish_Photo_Art wrote:
I found it and saved it to my favorites. I'll back to check it out even more when I can.

Actually there's little need for more than a cursory look to 'get the picture' (pun intended), and you don't want to go putting that in your favourites - people will think you're a GeekNerd!

Steve.
byrdgirl13
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 2:57:50 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 272
Location: Denver
Steve Crompton wrote:
dreamNwish_Photo_Art wrote:
I found it and saved it to my favorites. I'll back to check it out even more when I can.

Actually there's little need for more than a cursory look to 'get the picture' (pun intended), and you don't want to go putting that in your favourites - people will think you're a GeekNerd!

Steve.


or...that's a perfect reason to put it in your favorites! Idea

To be fair, many of my photos are in jpg format, because it's all the camera I shot them on took. I just place higher value on lossless compression than on the extra space it takes up. It's probably something like the difference between 256 or 312 kbps digital music vs the physical cd. The difference is there, but if you're doing it right, it's hard to detect.
Rooshoo
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 3:01:38 PM

Groups: Member

Joined: 6/11/2012
Posts: 76
Wow, there seems to be a lot of different opinions. I have used both PNG and JPG in the past, I currently use PNG for all of my vector designs on Zazzle with limited issues (mostly Illustrator glitches when saving for web). I'm relatively new to photography and Photoshop, so I'll have to mess around a bit. Thanks for all the insights and info folks--this really is a responsive, helpful community. Roses
Steve Crompton
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 3:12:18 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 12/3/2010
Posts: 1,448
@Rooshoo,
Quote:
I currently use PNG for all of my vector designs on Zazzle with limited issues (mostly Illustrator glitches when saving for web).


You do know that Zazzle accept .ai files?

Steve.
dreamNwish_Photo_Art
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 3:25:31 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 9/24/2009
Posts: 3,940
Steve Crompton wrote:
dreamNwish_Photo_Art wrote:
I found it and saved it to my favorites. I'll back to check it out even more when I can.

Actually there's little need for more than a cursory look to 'get the picture' (pun intended), and you don't want to go putting that in your favourites - people will think you're a GeekNerd!

Steve.


I'm trying to keep up with your GeekNerdness, Steve!
You're my inspiration! Laughing

Silly person!
dreamNwish_Photo_Art
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 3:29:43 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 9/24/2009
Posts: 3,940
byrdgirl13 wrote:
Steve Crompton wrote:
dreamNwish_Photo_Art wrote:
I found it and saved it to my favorites. I'll back to check it out even more when I can.

Actually there's little need for more than a cursory look to 'get the picture' (pun intended), and you don't want to go putting that in your favourites - people will think you're a GeekNerd!

Steve.


or...that's a perfect reason to put it in your favorites! Idea

To be fair, many of my photos are in jpg format, because it's all the camera I shot them on took. I just place higher value on lossless compression than on the extra space it takes up. It's probably something like the difference between 256 or 312 kbps digital music vs the physical cd. The difference is there, but if you're doing it right, it's hard to detect.



Why, thank you for the compliment! I can have a little sense when I want to! LOL!

I've slowly learned that sometimes you need to make more than one change on the camera for one good shot when it comes to digital cameras.
Back in the day, I had film, a viewfinder and a flash for my camera. I thought I was doing pretty well. Laughing
dreamNwish_Photo_Art
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 3:30:38 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 9/24/2009
Posts: 3,940
Rooshoo wrote:
Wow, there seems to be a lot of different opinions. I have used both PNG and JPG in the past, I currently use PNG for all of my vector designs on Zazzle with limited issues (mostly Illustrator glitches when saving for web). I'm relatively new to photography and Photoshop, so I'll have to mess around a bit. Thanks for all the insights and info folks--this really is a responsive, helpful community. Roses


You're welcome.


Good luck!
Rooshoo
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 3:54:51 PM

Groups: Member

Joined: 6/11/2012
Posts: 76
Steve Crompton wrote:
@Rooshoo,
Quote:
I currently use PNG for all of my vector designs on Zazzle with limited issues (mostly Illustrator glitches when saving for web).


You do know that Zazzle accept .ai files?

Steve.



I do, while there are certainly fewer save issues with .ai, I generally like the transparency of PNG for most illustrations. Smile
artberry
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 4:14:26 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 9/25/2007
Posts: 2,724
Location: Cardiff
Well there's nothing wrong with JPEGs in fact most Micro stock sites accept JPEGs. Some also accept RAW files and other formats but not all.

I suppose the only situation where the JPEG format is a disadvantage is when actually shooting digital photos. It's better to shoot in RAW mode if one's camera has this because it stores a lot more data which gives one a lot more control in the post production. But one would normally output the final image as a JPEG.

That said I've noticed recently Zazzle also accept TIFFs and since the Raw processing software which came with my Canon will output TIFF images I have tried this on one occasion and it's also useful if you want to further edit and image in GIMP or Photoshop. Of course TIFF images do tend to be quite large, particularly when they came from DSLR of 18mp or more.

Of course if one has a digital camera which doesn't shoot in RAW mode. It would seem a bit pointless converting the usual 80% JPEGs to PNG or TIFF because this isn't going to improve anything. In fact given most compact and bridge cameras have small sensors, and rely on the lossy nature of the JPEG format and internal processing to minimize noise, trying to improve things by sharpening and converting to uncompressed formats can even make matters worse since it will increase the noise. so ultimately there's no substitute for buying a better camera Smile
BedazzledByZazzle
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 4:55:44 PM
 Zazzle Proseller
Groups: ProSeller

Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 774
Rooshoo wrote:
Steve Crompton wrote:
@Rooshoo,
Quote:
I currently use PNG for all of my vector designs on Zazzle with limited issues (mostly Illustrator glitches when saving for web).


You do know that Zazzle accept .ai files?

Steve.



I do, while there are certainly fewer save issues with .ai, I generally like the transparency of PNG for most illustrations. Smile


Not sure from your reply if you know -- but AI can be transparent too... Just like a PNG.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
Print this topic
RSS Feed
Normal
Threaded